
Music educators have done a woefully poor job of promotion through the years; beginning with Lowell Mason and the Boston School Board and continuing now with 'Save the Music' programs (which are couched as being 'for the kids' but in reality, they're simply trying desperately to save band, choir and orchestra jobs).
Instead of capitalizing on the popularity of Rock Band, Guitar Hero and all other advances in technology, we choose to stick our collective heads in the ground and wonder why school music programs are dwindling.
There's a right way to go about it that will lead to a lifetime of joy for all who choose to partake. It's about relationships as well as delivery. Part of the current 'process' is teaching students to play Jingle Bells by the week after Thanksgiving - what adult cares about that? What kid in 2009 for that matter? That is equivalent to going for golf lessons and spending the first 6 months learning to master 'the windmill hole'.
We need to promote music education as a viable commodity without relying on academia for a market. It's dwindling anyway. The general public need to hear the message: enjoy the process of learning the language of music. There's no need to become a 'star', just enjoy music as a hobby like you would golf, gardening or reading. If we are successful, we can rejuvenate a struggling music education profession through private enterprise and 'save the music' programs will be a thing of the past.
1 comment:
Okay, so I don't necessarily disagree with these thoughts. Music can be part of people's lives through Guitar Hero and the like. If that satisfies someone's desires, great. But what if that approach was taken in other disciplines? Can film makers make great films without understanding how to craft a great story? Can doctors heal people just by learning how to stop the bleeding and give CPR? Can politicians solve problems just with their great ideas and no knowledge of the law?
Post a Comment